Brownian Motion

1.  Definition and existence

Consider the (one-dimensional for example) Gaussian transition density

\fs4  p(x,y;t) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi t}} \exp \left\{ -\frac{(x-y)^2}{2 t} \right\}

Define the measures, for all \fs4 t_1,\ldots,t_k \in T

\fs4  \mu_{t_1 \ldots t_k}(F_1 \times \cdots \times F_k)  = \int_{F_1 \times \cdots \times F_k} p(x,x_1;t_1)p(x_1,x_2;t_2-t_1)\cdots p(x_{k-1},x_k;t_{k-1}-t_k) d x_1 \cdots d x_k

Kolmogorov's extension theorem will provide us with the existence of a process with Gaussian increments \fs4 \{B_t\}_{t\geq 0}, which we define as the Brownian motion (started at \fs4 B_0 = x)

2.  Construction of Brownian motion

Assume an infinite collection of standard normal random variables \fs4 B_k^n, \fs4 n\in \mathbb{N}, \fs4 k odd, \fs4 k \leq 2^n; define the functions (called Haar functions)

  • \fs4 g_1^0 = 1
  • \fs4  g_k^n(u) = \left\{\begin{array}{rl} 2^{(n-1)/2} & \text{for }2^{-n}(k-1) < u \leq 2^{-n}k \\ -2^{(n-1)/2} & \text{for }2^{-n}k < u \leq 2^{-n}(k+1) \\ 0 & \text{elsewhere} \end{array} \right.
  • \fs4 f_k^n(t) = \int_0^t g_k^n(u) d u

The latter is a "tent shaped" function that we use to define an approximation on \fs4 t\in [0,1] of the BM

\fs4  B_n(t) = \sum_{\text{appr }k,n} f_k^n(t) B_k^n

The figure below illustrates this method of construction of the Brownian motion.

3.  Brownian motion is a martingale

Now assume that \fs4 \{B_t\}_{t \geq 0} is a Brownian motion and \fs4 \mathcal{F}_t is the generated filtration. Then \fs4 B_t is a martingale with respect to the probability measure \fs4 P

\fs4  E [B_t - B_s | \mathcal{F}_s] = 0 \text{, or } E [B_t | \mathcal{F}_s] = B_s

Also \fs4 B^2_t - t is a martingale. Levy's theorem states the converse: if \fs4 \{X_t\}_{t \geq 0} is a continuous martingale, and also \fs4 X^2_t - t is a martingale, then \fs4 X_t is a BM. A consequence is that every continuous martingale is a time-changed Brownian motion.

The process \fs4 \exp \left( \theta B_t - \frac{1}{2} \theta^2 t \right), for all \fs4 \theta \in \mathbb{R}, is the exponential martingale.

4.  Brownian motion is Gaussian, Markov and continuous

Brownian motion is Gaussian by definition, that is for all \fs4 t_1,\ldots,t_k \in T the random variable \fs4 B = (B_1,\ldots,B_k) has a multi-normal distribution

Also BM is Markov, as \fs4 E [f(B_{s+t})|\mathcal{F}_s] = P_t f(B_s) for the transition semigroup

\fs4 P_t f(x) = \int_{\mathbb{R}} p(x, y; t) f(y) d y

Kolmogorov's continuity theorem states that if for all \fs4 t\in T we can find constants \fs4 \alpha, \beta, \gamma > 0 such that

\fs4  E |X_{t_1}-X_{t_2}|^\alpha \leq \gamma |t_1 - t_2|^{1+\beta}, \text{ for all } 0\leq t_1,t_2 \leq t

then \fs4 X_t has continuous paths (or at least a version). For the Brownian motion

\fs4  E |B_{t_1}-B_{t_2}|^4 = 3 |t_1 - t_2|^2

and therefore \fs4 B_t has continuous sample paths

5.  Brownian motion is a diffusion

A diffusion \fs4 \{X_t\}_{t\geq 0} is a continuous, time homogeneous, Markov process that is "characterized" by its local drift \fs4 \mu and volatility \fs4 \sigma. For "small" \fs4 h

\fs4  E[X_{t+h}-X_t|\mathcal{F}_t] = h \cdot \mu(X_t) + o(h)
\fs4  E[(X_{t+h}-X_t-h\mu(X_t))^2|\mathcal{F}_t] = h \cdot \sigma^2(X_t) + o(h)

If the drift and volatility is constant, the process \fs4 X_t = \mu t + \sigma B_t for a BM \fs4 \{B_t\}_{t\geq 0} will also be a diffusion. More generally the instantaneous drift and volatility do not have to be constant, but can depend on the location \fs4 X_t and the time \fs4 t

6.  Brownian motion is wild

Brownian motion as a function of time \fs4 t \rightarrow B(t,\omega) is a lot wilder than most "normal" functions. In particular, although a Brownian motion is everywhere continuous, it is nowhere differentiable. Also, the total variation of the BM

\fs4  \sum |B_{t_{k+1}}-B_{t_k}| \rightarrow \infty

and the quadratic variation

\fs4  \sum |B_{t_{k+1}}-B_{t_k}| \rightarrow t

(for \fs4 t_{k+1}-t_k \rightarrow 0, \fs4 t_k\leq t)

For "normal" functions the total variation would be the length of the curve: to draw a Brownian motion on a finite interval we need infinite ink. The quadratic variation of "normal" functions is zero.

Finally, it is impossible to find a monotonic interval, therefore we cannot split a Brownian motion in two parts with a (non-vertical) line. These features are apparent if we zoom into the sample paths of a Brownian motion, as the figure below illustrates



What links here?


Got a question?

A short note

''To stop bots posting Viagra adverts as comments I have put a password in place. It just reads AEKARA, which you can use to edit the pages on this site. Sorry for any inconvenience but it was getting a real pain.

Comments(add/edit)

Very funny pictures <a href=" http://www.ign.com/blogs/xMaxporn ">Maxporn</a> >:-[